The Democrat party prides itself in "Diversity", "Equity" and "Inclusion", that is the primary theme of everything they have done in this particular current Democrat administration. The first four-star trans admiral, the first black Supreme Court justice (who appears to be well qualified), the first man who identifies as a woman and wears stolen dresses and is a "Pup" dominatrix. The first gay this, the first woman that, the first Black, Brown, Yellow or Red whatever. And I get it, symbolism has its place in transmitting (no pun intended) a signal of inclusion to those who might live in and experience a unique or different nontraditional American life. Symbolism can be powerful. BUT THERE IS A LINE!
Besides being "The First" there must accompany that the qualifications, competence and allegiance to the country that a government, a country must have in the running of the very large and very consequential operation that is government in America. This entire movement based on "The First" if you have not noticed is based on anti and un-American beliefs. And while there can be argument within our society and government and there can be changes and adjustments made to accommodate you must be first competent and second you must have a fundamental connection and allegiance to America. And if those two fundamental conditions are not met then whom ever has created this attempted paradigm shift in America can only be considered subversive and the enemy within.
And so, what do we see before us all in the race for the presidency on the symbolism side of the equation? A woman who is plainly to every and all who is not qualified in the least to inhabit the big chair behind the Resolute Desk in the White House. Her gender and her skin color are just not enough. I know it and you know it even if you are not willing or able to admit it to yourself. And that is what contentious politics does to people, it tribalizes people with propaganda and ideology.
I am ready willing and able to vote for a woman, even a Black, Red, White or Brown woman as president. But she will be competent, she will be intelligent, she will be more Conservatively minded, she will be a strong leader, she will understand Americas position in the world and the special place good, bad or otherwise that it inhabits. And most of all she will understand the essentials about what the Constitution proposes, equality before the law, that has elevated America to the position of dominance that it has attained. And she will be strong willed and intractable in relation to her thinking on those subjects.
What the Democrat party which is now infested with radical people on the Left who just need a symbol and a signature in the front line at the Resolute Desk in the White House is a great danger to your country. Why? Because that model of operation is a projection of weakness, a symbolic transmission to all of those who oppose America and seek their own dominance in the world. And in order for that to take place America as you know it must be no more! Make no mistake.
Give me a strong, smart, competent America centric Constitutionally minded patriotic woman of ANY skin color and I am all yours! Until that time mere female symbolism and skin color is just not going to cut it. No apologies offered.
Are you paying attention yet America? JGL 10/26/24
I find it interesting that Kamala, and Hillary and other Dem women claim to be so pro women, but always dress in square jackets,exuding broad shoulders and pantsuits. Is depicting feminity a threat to their power?? I mean - would it kill ya to wear a dress occasionally?